Categories
Financial markets

Various rescue programs were employed by Central Banks during the 8 Financial

Various rescue programs were employed by Central Banks during the 8 Financial Crisis as well as during the Covid-19 induced pandemic. Explain and analyze any one of the rescue programs with a focus on what was the intended effect? (Read chapter 4). Limit your answer to 3 paragraphs. Make sure the answer is focused and you have an external citation!

Categories
Financial markets

Using the www.yahoofinance.com site or other site with stock information, choose

Using the www.yahoofinance.com site or other site with stock information choose six firms: two each from three different industries. Gather the following information for each stock: 1) beta for each of these firms; and 2) the total return for the previous year for each firm. Also find the return on the S&P Index for the same time period. Given the information you have obtained discuss the differences you observe. How do the betas and returns compare? What are the similarities and differences you observe within industries? What are the similarities and differences you observe between industries? How would you explain your results in term of the following concepts: Total Risk Systematic Risk Idiosyncratic Risk

Categories
Financial markets

Using the www.yahoofinance.com site or other site with stock information, choose

Using the www.yahoofinance.com site or other site with stock information choose six firms: two each from three different industries. Gather the following information for each stock: 1) beta for each of these firms; and 2) the total return for the previous year for each firm. Also find the return on the S&P Index for the same time period. Given the information you have obtained discuss the differences you observe. How do the betas and returns compare? What are the similarities and differences you observe within industries? What are the similarities and differences you observe between industries? How would you explain your results in term of the following concepts: Total Risk Systematic Risk Idiosyncratic Risk

Categories
Financial markets

Using Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing Imagine that you are an expert

Using Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing Imagine that you are an expert in Website Analytics and you have been hired to manage a companys websites. A successful website is one where visitors come and spend time on the site. More time spent on the site is desirable because you can then convince advertisers to pay you to place their ads on your sites. You have been asked to analyze performance of the following websites: WGG.com “ Watching Grass Grow a website showing real-time video of a field of grass growing on the lawn. Some data collection analysis of WGG visitors showed that out of 100 unique visitors the average duration was equal to 2 minutes with a standard deviation equal to 20 minutes. With 99% confidence calculate an interval that estimates the true duration of time a visitor would spend on the WGG site. Test the hypothesis that visitors do not spend a significant amount of time on the WGG site. Would you conclude that this is an accurate statement? Based on your analysis would you recommend that advertisers buy time and space to display their ads on the WGG site? Explain

Categories
Financial markets

Unit VII Assessment Q1. Why is it important not to view the concept of whistleb

Unit VII Assessment Q1. Why is it important not to view the concept of whistleblowing as tattling or ratting on another employee? Your response should be 75 words in length. Q2. Discuss bribery. Would actions such as politicians adding earmarks in legislation or pharmaceutical salespersons giving away drugs to physicians constitute bribery? Identify three business activities that would constitute bribery and three actions that would not. Your response should be 75 words in length. Q3. Why should firms formulate and implement strategies from an environmental perspective? Your response should be 75 words in length. Q4. How can firms ensure that their code of business ethics is read understood believed remembered and acted on rather than ignored? Your response should be 75 words in length. Q5. What do you feel is the relationship between personal ethics and business ethics? Are they or should they be the same? Your response should be words in length. Unit VII Journal You are opening your own small business and want to establish a culture of ethical behavior. What are some procedures you should implement to support an ethics culture? Your journal entry must be at least words. No references or citations are necessary. Unit VI Journal Suppose you are a leader responsible for an organizations vision/mission statements. How often do you think they should be changed? What are some reasons you might consider changing them? Your journal entry must be at least words. No references or citations are necessary.

Categories
Financial markets

Uber is largely hailed as the advent of the gig economy, which is the idea that

Uber is largely hailed as the advent of the gig economy which is the idea that people do not work as permanent employees for one employer but instead work in a labor market characterized by short-term contracts or freelance work. While creating a new type of entrepreneurship for individuals a gig economy raises a host of new legal questions about the law of agency for companies utilizing gig workers. Your boss at an investment firm has asked you to evaluate Ubers legal exposure for the conduct of its drivers given the information below and identify and to explain the law and legal liability in this vast new gig economy world. Write a 3 page interoffice memo in which you do the following: Summarize the main principles of agency law as they relate to Ubers relationship with its drivers. Analyze the circumstances under which Uber might be liable for the conduct of a driver who while intoxicated caused an accident involving personal property damage and bodily injury. Identify the steps Uber can take if any to limit its legal exposure due to the conduct of its drivers. Include at least three quality references. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not count as quality references. See attachment for guide

Categories
Financial markets

Topic: Financial Planning and Forecasting Financial Statements Research/find a m

Topic: Financial Planning and Forecasting Financial Statements Research/find a minimum at least four (4) preferably five (5) or more different peer-reviewed articles on your topic from the University of the Cumberlands Library online business database. The article(s) must be relevant and from a peer-reviewed source. While you may use relevant articles from any time frame current/drafted within the last five (5) years are preferred. Using literature that is irrelevant or unrelated to the chosen topic will result in a point reduction. Write a four (4) to five (5) page double spaced paper in APA format discussing the findings on your specific topic in your own words.Note“ paper length does not include cover page abstract or references page(s). Cover page Overviewdescribing the importance of the research topic to current business and professional practice in your own words. Purpose of Researchshould reflect the potential benefit of the topic to the current business and professional practice and the larger body of research. Review of the Literaturesummarized in your own words. Note that this should not be a copy and paste of literature content nor should this section be substantially filled with direct quotes from the article. A literature review is a summary of the major points and findings of each of the selected articles (with appropriate citations). Direct quotations should be used sparingly. Normally this will be the largest section of your paper (this is not a requirement; just a general observation). Practical Applicationof the literature. Describe how your findings from the relevant research literature can shape inform and improve current business and professional practice related to your chosen topic. Conclusionin your own words Referencesformatted according to APA style requirements

Categories
Financial markets

This weeks assignment: Pick a company (Netflix) that you like that offers stock.

This weeks assignment: Pick a company (Netflix) that you like that offers stock. Write a two-page report on the history of that stock include: What is the company?; when was stock first offered?; how much was it per share when it was first offered?; how is it doing now? If you bought 1 000 shares when it was first offered “ how much money would you have now?

Categories
Financial markets

This week, you will begin to synthesize the information you have gathered and th

This week you will begin to synthesize the information you have gathered and the analysis you have conducted of your selected technology. In order to bring your ideas together and prepare for your final presentation you will complete a recommendation analysis. The recommendation analysis should provide three to four concrete recommendations for how to best utilize your selected technology. As part of your analysis include the following. Introduction: Explain your selected technology and provide contextual details concerning application and reach. Thesis: Offer an argument to synthesize your ideas and provide a foundation for your recommendations and analysis. Ethical Dilemmas: Identify and describe three to four ethical dilemmas posed by your selected technology. Include concrete examples and ethical theories to help detail your summary. Recommendations: Offer concrete recommendations to help mediate each of the described dilemmas. Remember to consider stakeholders and resources for providing solutions. Conclusion: Summarize your main arguments and provide avenues for further discussion. As part of this assignment you must consult and site at least three high-quality academic sources. These sources should be from reputable publications that can be found in the DeVry Library or industry publications. A successful assignment will be three to four pages in length; include a minimum of three academic sources; be composed using Microsoft Word and using 12-point Times New Roman; include a minimum of three sources; and be formatted and cite sources using the seventh edition of APA. Dont forget to submit your assignment for grading. Rubric LMA: GE.LAS432.JUL18LMA: GE.LAS432.JUL18CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Critical Thinking (26 Points)Critical Thinking26 to >23.0 ptsExcellentThe paper includes a strong original central idea that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.23 to >20.0 ptsCompetentThe paper includes a central ideas with few tangents and diversions that unifies the argument but lacks clarity or creativity.20 to >17.0 ptsFairThe paper attempts to form a cohesive idea but lacks concrete focus and unification of key components.17 to >14.0 ptsPoorThe paper has no unifying central idea to link key components of the argument together.14 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.26 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.A.Critical ThinkingCapstone Assessment of Student Mastery of Critical Thinking skillsthreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Strong original central idea that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Central ideas with few tangents and diversions that unifies the argument but lacks clarity or creativity.2 ptsFair: Capstone “ Student Performance: Attempts to form a cohesive idea but lacks concrete focus and unification of key components.1 ptsPoor: Capstone “ Student Performance: No unifying central idea to link key components of the argument together.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone “ Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Communication (16 points)16 to >14.0 ptsExcellentThe paper clearly communicates central ideas through precise use of language attention to audience grammar and mechanics and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.14 to >12.0 ptsCompetentThe paper communicates central ideas by demonstrating proficient use of language audience awareness grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.12 to >10.0 ptsFairThe paper attempts to communicate central ideas but needs more proficient use of language stronger attention to audience and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics needs improvement.10 to >8.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks a clear understanding of language usage audience awareness and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding.8 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.16 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.B.CommunicationCapstone Assessment of Student Communication Skillsthreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Communicates central ideas through precise use of language attention to audience grammar and mechanics and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Communicates central ideas by demonstrating proficient use of language audience awareness grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.2 ptsLimited: Capstone “ Student Performance: Attempts to communicate central ideas but needs more proficient use of language stronger attention to audience and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics needs improvement.1 ptsPoor: Capstone “ Student Performance: Lacks a clear understanding of language usage audience awareness and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone “ Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Information Literacy (21 Points)21 to >19.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates a strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and resourceful academic research. Evidence is used to forward the argument and develop conclusions and recommendations.19 to >17.0 ptsCompetentThe paper uses key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently to facilitate conclusions and recommendations.17 to >15.0 ptsFairThe paper uses limited incomplete or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to conclusions and recommendations.15 to >13.0 ptsPoorThe central argument is not supported or developed through evidence. The paper lacks detailed conclusions and recommendations.13 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.21 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.C.Information Literacythreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and resourceful academic research. Evidence is used to forward the argument and develop conclusions and recommendations.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Uses key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently to facilitate conclusions and recommendations.2 ptsLimited: Capstone “ Student Performance: Uses limited incomplete or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to conclusions and recommendations.1 ptsPoor: Capstone “ Student Performance: The central argument is not supported or developed through evidence. The paper lacks detailed conclusions and recommendations.and recommendations.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone “ Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Technology Literacy (16 Points)16 to >14.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates a clear understanding of the technology studied and utilizes media and electronic resources to support arguments and sustain teamwork.14 to >12.0 ptsCompetentThe paper leverages some knowledge of contemporary technologies and media and electronic resources to support basic arguments.12 to >10.0 ptsFairThe paper demonstrates minimal knowledge of contemporary technologies and utilizes median and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact on the overall argument.10 to >8.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks a clear knowledge of contemporary technologies and does not utilize median and electronic resources effectively.8 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.16 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.D.Technology Literacythreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Clear understanding of the technology studied and utilizes media and electronic resources to support arguments and sustain teamwork.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Leverages some knowledge of contemporary technologies and media and electronic resources to support basic arguments.2 ptsLimited: Capstone “ Student Performance: Minimal knowledge of contemporary technologies and utilizes median and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact on the overall argument1 ptsPoor: The paper lacks a clear knowledge of contemporary technologies and does not utilize median and electronic resources effectively.0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Cultural Competence (21 Points)21 to >19.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates strong evidence of collaboration encompasses diverse fields of knowledge and illustrate create thought processes to address global problems.19 to >17.0 ptsCompetentThe paper demonstrates some evidence of collaboration includes multiple fields of knowledge and illustrates competence in problem solving.17 to >15.0 ptsFairThe paper demonstrates limited evidence of collaboration includes few or limited fields of knowledge and lacks creative problem solving.15 to >13.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks clear evidence of collaboration does not include multiple fields of knowledge as evidence and lacks problem solving skills.13 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.21 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.E.Cultural Competencethreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Strong evidence of collaboration encompasses diverse fields of knowledge and illustrate create thought processes to address global problems.3 ptsComptent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Some evidence of collaboration includes multiple fields of knowledge and illustrates competence in problem solving.2 ptsLimited: Capstone “ Student Performance: Limited evidence of collaboration includes few or limited fields of knowledge and lacks creative problem solving.1 ptsPoor: Capstone “ Student Performance: Lacks clear evidence of collaboration does not include multiple fields of knowledge as evidence and lacks problem solving skills.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone “ Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Global Awareness and Civic Engagement (26 Points)26 to >23.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates a clear sense of global awareness through concrete recommendations for action.23 to >20.0 ptsCompetentThe paper demonstrates some notions of global awareness and makes at least one recommendation for action.20 to >17.0 ptsFairThe paper demonstrates a vague sense of global awareness and does not include specific recommendations for action.17 to >14.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks global awareness of contemporary issues and makes no recommendations for action.14 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.26 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.F.Global Awareness and Civic Engagementthreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Clear sense of global awareness through concrete recommendations for action.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Some notions of global awareness and makes at least one recommendation for action.2 ptsLimited: Capstone “ Student Performance: Vague sense of global awareness and does not include specific recommendations for action.1 ptsPoor: Capstone “ Student Performance: Lacks global awareness of contemporary issues and makes no recommendations for action.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone “ Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts Total Points: 150]

Categories
Financial markets

This week, you will begin to synthesize the information you have gathered and th

This week you will begin to synthesize the information you have gathered and the analysis you have conducted of your selected technology. In order to bring your ideas together and prepare for your final presentation you will complete a recommendation analysis. The recommendation analysis should provide three to four concrete recommendations for how to best utilize your selected technology. As part of your analysis include the following. Introduction: Explain your selected technology and provide contextual details concerning application and reach. Thesis: Offer an argument to synthesize your ideas and provide a foundation for your recommendations and analysis. Ethical Dilemmas: Identify and describe three to four ethical dilemmas posed by your selected technology. Include concrete examples and ethical theories to help detail your summary. Recommendations: Offer concrete recommendations to help mediate each of the described dilemmas. Remember to consider stakeholders and resources for providing solutions. Conclusion: Summarize your main arguments and provide avenues for further discussion. As part of this assignment you must consult and site at least three high-quality academic sources. These sources should be from reputable publications that can be found in the DeVry Library or industry publications. A successful assignment will be three to four pages in length; include a minimum of three academic sources; be composed using Microsoft Word and using 12-point Times New Roman; include a minimum of three sources; and be formatted and cite sources using the seventh edition of APA. Dont forget to submit your assignment for grading. Rubric LMA: GE.LAS432.JUL18LMA: GE.LAS432.JUL18CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Critical Thinking (26 Points)Critical Thinking26 to >23.0 ptsExcellentThe paper includes a strong original central idea that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.23 to >20.0 ptsCompetentThe paper includes a central ideas with few tangents and diversions that unifies the argument but lacks clarity or creativity.20 to >17.0 ptsFairThe paper attempts to form a cohesive idea but lacks concrete focus and unification of key components.17 to >14.0 ptsPoorThe paper has no unifying central idea to link key components of the argument together.14 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.26 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.A.Critical ThinkingCapstone Assessment of Student Mastery of Critical Thinking skillsthreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Strong original central idea that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Central ideas with few tangents and diversions that unifies the argument but lacks clarity or creativity.2 ptsFair: Capstone “ Student Performance: Attempts to form a cohesive idea but lacks concrete focus and unification of key components.1 ptsPoor: Capstone “ Student Performance: No unifying central idea to link key components of the argument together.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone “ Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Communication (16 points)16 to >14.0 ptsExcellentThe paper clearly communicates central ideas through precise use of language attention to audience grammar and mechanics and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.14 to >12.0 ptsCompetentThe paper communicates central ideas by demonstrating proficient use of language audience awareness grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.12 to >10.0 ptsFairThe paper attempts to communicate central ideas but needs more proficient use of language stronger attention to audience and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics needs improvement.10 to >8.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks a clear understanding of language usage audience awareness and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding.8 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.16 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.B.CommunicationCapstone Assessment of Student Communication Skillsthreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Communicates central ideas through precise use of language attention to audience grammar and mechanics and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Communicates central ideas by demonstrating proficient use of language audience awareness grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.2 ptsLimited: Capstone “ Student Performance: Attempts to communicate central ideas but needs more proficient use of language stronger attention to audience and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics needs improvement.1 ptsPoor: Capstone “ Student Performance: Lacks a clear understanding of language usage audience awareness and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone “ Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Information Literacy (21 Points)21 to >19.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates a strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and resourceful academic research. Evidence is used to forward the argument and develop conclusions and recommendations.19 to >17.0 ptsCompetentThe paper uses key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently to facilitate conclusions and recommendations.17 to >15.0 ptsFairThe paper uses limited incomplete or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to conclusions and recommendations.15 to >13.0 ptsPoorThe central argument is not supported or developed through evidence. The paper lacks detailed conclusions and recommendations.13 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.21 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.C.Information Literacythreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and resourceful academic research. Evidence is used to forward the argument and develop conclusions and recommendations.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Uses key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently to facilitate conclusions and recommendations.2 ptsLimited: Capstone “ Student Performance: Uses limited incomplete or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to conclusions and recommendations.1 ptsPoor: Capstone “ Student Performance: The central argument is not supported or developed through evidence. The paper lacks detailed conclusions and recommendations.and recommendations.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone “ Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Technology Literacy (16 Points)16 to >14.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates a clear understanding of the technology studied and utilizes media and electronic resources to support arguments and sustain teamwork.14 to >12.0 ptsCompetentThe paper leverages some knowledge of contemporary technologies and media and electronic resources to support basic arguments.12 to >10.0 ptsFairThe paper demonstrates minimal knowledge of contemporary technologies and utilizes median and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact on the overall argument.10 to >8.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks a clear knowledge of contemporary technologies and does not utilize median and electronic resources effectively.8 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.16 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.D.Technology Literacythreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Clear understanding of the technology studied and utilizes media and electronic resources to support arguments and sustain teamwork.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Leverages some knowledge of contemporary technologies and media and electronic resources to support basic arguments.2 ptsLimited: Capstone “ Student Performance: Minimal knowledge of contemporary technologies and utilizes median and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact on the overall argument1 ptsPoor: The paper lacks a clear knowledge of contemporary technologies and does not utilize median and electronic resources effectively.0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Cultural Competence (21 Points)21 to >19.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates strong evidence of collaboration encompasses diverse fields of knowledge and illustrate create thought processes to address global problems.19 to >17.0 ptsCompetentThe paper demonstrates some evidence of collaboration includes multiple fields of knowledge and illustrates competence in problem solving.17 to >15.0 ptsFairThe paper demonstrates limited evidence of collaboration includes few or limited fields of knowledge and lacks creative problem solving.15 to >13.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks clear evidence of collaboration does not include multiple fields of knowledge as evidence and lacks problem solving skills.13 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.21 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.E.Cultural Competencethreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Strong evidence of collaboration encompasses diverse fields of knowledge and illustrate create thought processes to address global problems.3 ptsComptent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Some evidence of collaboration includes multiple fields of knowledge and illustrates competence in problem solving.2 ptsLimited: Capstone “ Student Performance: Limited evidence of collaboration includes few or limited fields of knowledge and lacks creative problem solving.1 ptsPoor: Capstone “ Student Performance: Lacks clear evidence of collaboration does not include multiple fields of knowledge as evidence and lacks problem solving skills.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone “ Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Global Awareness and Civic Engagement (26 Points)26 to >23.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates a clear sense of global awareness through concrete recommendations for action.23 to >20.0 ptsCompetentThe paper demonstrates some notions of global awareness and makes at least one recommendation for action.20 to >17.0 ptsFairThe paper demonstrates a vague sense of global awareness and does not include specific recommendations for action.17 to >14.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks global awareness of contemporary issues and makes no recommendations for action.14 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.26 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.F.Global Awareness and Civic Engagementthreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Clear sense of global awareness through concrete recommendations for action.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone “ Student Performance: Some notions of global awareness and makes at least one recommendation for action.2 ptsLimited: Capstone “ Student Performance: Vague sense of global awareness and does not include specific recommendations for action.1 ptsPoor: Capstone “ Student Performance: Lacks global awareness of contemporary issues and makes no recommendations for action.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone “ Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts Total Points: 150]